People analytics for finance
Workforce is usually the largest cost line — and the least reconciled. Get one governed version of headcount, FTE and cost that matches the board pack.
Why the numbers never matched
- HR counts people; finance counts cost centers — different systems, different truths
- Headcount in the deck differs from headcount in the ledger, every month
- FTE is estimated in a spreadsheet that nobody fully owns
- Every reconciliation meeting burns analyst time on both sides
One shared version of truth
- Governed definitions of headcount, FTE and cost — computed identically for HR and Finance
- Versioned metric releases: you can see what changed and when
- Lineage from every figure back to source systems and extraction jobs
- Scheduled PDF/PPTX exports — the board pack arrives already assembled
Forecasting you can plan on
ML Studio projects headcount and attrition forward on the governed model — so budget scenarios start from defensible baselines, not last quarter’s guess. Multi-page governed reports package the numbers for monthly business review.
Questions finance teams ask
Will the numbers reconcile with our HR system?
That is the point. Metrics are computed once, on governed definitions, and every figure carries lineage back to the source — so discrepancies are traceable, not argued about.
Can we keep our own cost model?
Yes. The metric registry supports reviewed, versioned custom metrics — your cost definitions become the platform’s definitions.
How do reports reach our board pack?
Published reports export to PDF and PPTX on a schedule. The same governed data feeds both dashboards and documents — no re-keying.
Bring your reconciliation problem
Show us where HR and Finance numbers diverge today — we will trace it through the pipeline.